<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1317 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343579</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2007-08 as the audit objection related to other assessment years, not the one under appeal. The judgment highlighted the necessity for the specific audit objection to be linked to the assessment year in question when determining the Revenue&#039;s eligibility to appeal based on the prescribed tax effect limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 08:10:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1317 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343579</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2007-08 as the audit objection related to other assessment years, not the one under appeal. The judgment highlighted the necessity for the specific audit objection to be linked to the assessment year in question when determining the Revenue&#039;s eligibility to appeal based on the prescribed tax effect limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>