<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1306 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343568</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty proceedings based on the invalid notice that failed to specify the charges for which the penalty was imposed. The judgment highlighted the importance of clear and specific penalty notices to ensure the assessee&#039;s right to a fair opportunity to defend their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 08:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1306 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343568</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty proceedings based on the invalid notice that failed to specify the charges for which the penalty was imposed. The judgment highlighted the importance of clear and specific penalty notices to ensure the assessee&#039;s right to a fair opportunity to defend their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>