<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 863 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in part, holding that the initiation of reassessment proceedings by the Assessing Officer (AO) was not valid and the assessment order was quashed. The Tribunal did not adjudicate on the issue of the genuineness of the alleged bogus purchases due to the invalidity of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 863 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in part, holding that the initiation of reassessment proceedings by the Assessing Officer (AO) was not valid and the assessment order was quashed. The Tribunal did not adjudicate on the issue of the genuineness of the alleged bogus purchases due to the invalidity of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>