<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 88 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192373</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred before the commencement of a business to put cinema premises into a serviceable condition was not allowable as current repairs under section 10(2)(v) or as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. Current repairs presuppose an existing business and the preservation of an already existing asset, while section 10(2)(xv) applies only to expenditure laid out for a business already in existence. Where the outlay is made before operations begin, it is directed to bringing a serviceable asset into existence and is capital in nature. Only expenditure incurred after commencement of business could be considered separately for allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 12:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 88 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192373</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred before the commencement of a business to put cinema premises into a serviceable condition was not allowable as current repairs under section 10(2)(v) or as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. Current repairs presuppose an existing business and the preservation of an already existing asset, while section 10(2)(xv) applies only to expenditure laid out for a business already in existence. Where the outlay is made before operations begin, it is directed to bringing a serviceable asset into existence and is capital in nature. Only expenditure incurred after commencement of business could be considered separately for allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>