<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1303 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343565</link>
    <description>The appellants were held liable to pay service tax on a reverse charge basis for commissions paid to overseas agents for the normal period starting from 18/04/2006. The demands for the extended period were deemed unsustainable, and penalties were set aside. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the appellants required to pay service tax only for the normal period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1303 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343565</link>
      <description>The appellants were held liable to pay service tax on a reverse charge basis for commissions paid to overseas agents for the normal period starting from 18/04/2006. The demands for the extended period were deemed unsustainable, and penalties were set aside. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the appellants required to pay service tax only for the normal period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>