<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1301 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343563</link>
    <description>Supply of aircraft on charter hire was treated as supply of tangible goods for use service, and the taxable value was confined to receipts forming consideration; items such as dividend income, interest, refunds, sale profits, fuel cost and similar sums were excluded as non-consideration amounts. Tax already paid under a wrong category was allowed to be adjusted against liability under the correct category when the returns supported the figures. Reverse charge demand on foreign remittances for spares, aircraft import and lease-related payments was unsustainable because the records did not show receipt of taxable management, maintenance or repair services from foreign providers. Penalties were waived because tax and interest had been paid and the dispute was bona fide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1301 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343563</link>
      <description>Supply of aircraft on charter hire was treated as supply of tangible goods for use service, and the taxable value was confined to receipts forming consideration; items such as dividend income, interest, refunds, sale profits, fuel cost and similar sums were excluded as non-consideration amounts. Tax already paid under a wrong category was allowed to be adjusted against liability under the correct category when the returns supported the figures. Reverse charge demand on foreign remittances for spares, aircraft import and lease-related payments was unsustainable because the records did not show receipt of taxable management, maintenance or repair services from foreign providers. Penalties were waived because tax and interest had been paid and the dispute was bona fide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>