<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343562</link>
    <description>For the period before 01.04.2011, the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was broad and covered services used in relation to business activities. Credit was admissible where the services were used for providing output services, and the disputed services, including business support, renting of immovable property, courier, telecommunication, supply of tangible goods, rent-a-cab, air travel, management consultancy, maintenance, security, insurance and manpower recruitment, were treated as connected with the business and essential to rendering output services. Denial of credit for alleged lack of nexus was therefore not justified, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 07:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1300 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343562</link>
      <description>For the period before 01.04.2011, the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was broad and covered services used in relation to business activities. Credit was admissible where the services were used for providing output services, and the disputed services, including business support, renting of immovable property, courier, telecommunication, supply of tangible goods, rent-a-cab, air travel, management consultancy, maintenance, security, insurance and manpower recruitment, were treated as connected with the business and essential to rendering output services. Denial of credit for alleged lack of nexus was therefore not justified, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>