<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1299 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a construction company, to avail Cenvat credit on sub-contractors&#039; bills for construction services, amounting to Rs. 1,07,28,250. The Tribunal rejected allegations of mala-fide and suppression in availing service tax credit, holding that the appellant had rightfully taken input service tax credit. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST, setting aside the demand for interest on the abated amount. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues, granting them consequential benefits and overturning the Order-in-Original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1299 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a construction company, to avail Cenvat credit on sub-contractors&#039; bills for construction services, amounting to Rs. 1,07,28,250. The Tribunal rejected allegations of mala-fide and suppression in availing service tax credit, holding that the appellant had rightfully taken input service tax credit. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST, setting aside the demand for interest on the abated amount. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues, granting them consequential benefits and overturning the Order-in-Original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>