https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343558 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT credit on insurance services post 10.9.2004, citing Rule 9(1)(f) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and extended the limitation period for demand due to misrepresentation by the appellant. The appellant was granted the option to pay 25% of the duty evaded as penalty within 30 days for final closure of the case, subject to fulfilling the specified conditions. en-us Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343558 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of CENVAT credit on insurance services post 10.9.2004, citing Rule 9(1)(f) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and extended the limitation period for demand due to misrepresentation by the appellant. The appellant was granted the option to pay 25% of the duty evaded as penalty within 30 days for final closure of the case, subject to fulfilling the specified conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343558