<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1289 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. E/54591/2014 and dismissed Appeal No. E/53649/2014, clarifying that the definition of trading as a service under Notification No. 3/2011 C.E. N.T. was not applicable to transactions before 01.04.2011. This decision provides a clear interpretation of the legal provisions and their temporal application, ensuring proper adjudication based on the statutory framework in force during the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1289 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. E/54591/2014 and dismissed Appeal No. E/53649/2014, clarifying that the definition of trading as a service under Notification No. 3/2011 C.E. N.T. was not applicable to transactions before 01.04.2011. This decision provides a clear interpretation of the legal provisions and their temporal application, ensuring proper adjudication based on the statutory framework in force during the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>