<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1288 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., directing the Original Authority to refund the deposited amount of Rs. 20,33,747/- with interest. The Tribunal held that as the amount was not in compliance with any confirmed demand and was deposited based on the Department&#039;s insistence, the appellant was entitled to the refund. The decision emphasized the necessity of confirming demands before making deposits and the requirement of legal authority for appropriations by the exchequer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1288 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., directing the Original Authority to refund the deposited amount of Rs. 20,33,747/- with interest. The Tribunal held that as the amount was not in compliance with any confirmed demand and was deposited based on the Department&#039;s insistence, the appellant was entitled to the refund. The decision emphasized the necessity of confirming demands before making deposits and the requirement of legal authority for appropriations by the exchequer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>