<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (6) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7970</link>
    <description>For computing penalty under section 271(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, the expression &quot;the tax&quot; was read, in context, as the tax actually payable after credit for amounts already paid, including tax paid under provisional assessment. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention that penalty had to be calculated on the assessed tax without such deductions. It further held that the definition of &quot;tax&quot; in section 2(43) did not displace the contextual reading, and applied the settled rule that a penal provision reasonably admitting of two constructions must be construed in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s reduced penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (6) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7970</link>
      <description>For computing penalty under section 271(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, the expression &quot;the tax&quot; was read, in context, as the tax actually payable after credit for amounts already paid, including tax paid under provisional assessment. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention that penalty had to be calculated on the assessed tax without such deductions. It further held that the definition of &quot;tax&quot; in section 2(43) did not displace the contextual reading, and applied the settled rule that a penal provision reasonably admitting of two constructions must be construed in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s reduced penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>