https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343549 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the remission claim and allowing the appeals with consequential benefits. It was held that the fire incident was beyond the appellant's control, and there was no negligence on their part. The appellant was entitled to remission for the semi-finished/finished goods destroyed in the fire accident. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 May 2017 07:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343549 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the remission claim and allowing the appeals with consequential benefits. It was held that the fire incident was beyond the appellant's control, and there was no negligence on their part. The appellant was entitled to remission for the semi-finished/finished goods destroyed in the fire accident. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343549