https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343544 An appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent was held not maintainable where the Single Judge's order arose in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC connected with pending criminal law proceedings concerning seizure and proposed confiscation of a vehicle under the Customs Act. The governing test was the character of the proceedings: because the petition related to criminal proceedings and the relief sought was in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction, the matter was treated as criminal in nature. The distinction drawn from decisions involving writ petitions under Article 226 was held inapplicable, and the appeal failed on maintainability. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343544 An appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent was held not maintainable where the Single Judge's order arose in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC connected with pending criminal law proceedings concerning seizure and proposed confiscation of a vehicle under the Customs Act. The governing test was the character of the proceedings: because the petition related to criminal proceedings and the relief sought was in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction, the matter was treated as criminal in nature. The distinction drawn from decisions involving writ petitions under Article 226 was held inapplicable, and the appeal failed on maintainability. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343544