<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343532</link>
    <description>Where an assessee substantiates loans with account payee cheques and documentary evidence showing the creditors&#039; identity, genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness, the initial burden under section 68 stands discharged. In this ITAT matter, the addition was based mainly on Investigation Wing information and a third-party statement, without independent enquiry or any specific defect in the assessee&#039;s evidence. As the Revenue failed to rebut the material with cogent evidence, the addition under section 68 and the consequential interest disallowance were deleted and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 07:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343532</link>
      <description>Where an assessee substantiates loans with account payee cheques and documentary evidence showing the creditors&#039; identity, genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness, the initial burden under section 68 stands discharged. In this ITAT matter, the addition was based mainly on Investigation Wing information and a third-party statement, without independent enquiry or any specific defect in the assessee&#039;s evidence. As the Revenue failed to rebut the material with cogent evidence, the addition under section 68 and the consequential interest disallowance were deleted and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>