<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1268 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that substantial investment in a new asset before the due date of filing the return qualifies for deduction under section 54, despite the construction not being completed within the specified period. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption claimed by the assessee. The judgment emphasized that fulfilling the investment requirement within the stipulated period suffices for exemption under section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1268 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that substantial investment in a new asset before the due date of filing the return qualifies for deduction under section 54, despite the construction not being completed within the specified period. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption claimed by the assessee. The judgment emphasized that fulfilling the investment requirement within the stipulated period suffices for exemption under section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>