https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192367 The court partially allowed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to deposit only 20% of the differential duty instead of the imposed 100%, excluding the 25% bank guarantee requirement. The goods were ordered to be released provisionally, with both parties retaining their rights and contentions. The court found the 100% duty condition to be excessive and considered a lower deposit percentage in line with the amended Customs Act. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192367 The court partially allowed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to deposit only 20% of the differential duty instead of the imposed 100%, excluding the 25% bank guarantee requirement. The goods were ordered to be released provisionally, with both parties retaining their rights and contentions. The court found the 100% duty condition to be excessive and considered a lower deposit percentage in line with the amended Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192367