<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1537 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192369</link>
    <description>Liberty was granted to the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under Sections 28(5) and 28(6) of the Customs Act if a show cause notice is issued, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court reserved all rights and contentions of the parties and made no adjudication on the merits of the request for reduction of the bank guarantee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 07:03:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1537 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192369</link>
      <description>Liberty was granted to the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under Sections 28(5) and 28(6) of the Customs Act if a show cause notice is issued, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court reserved all rights and contentions of the parties and made no adjudication on the merits of the request for reduction of the bank guarantee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>