<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1253 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties under Section 76 and 75A of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s proactive compliance by registering and paying taxes before the Show Cause Notice demonstrated good faith, leading to the decision that penalties were unwarranted. Only interest for delayed payment was upheld, and the Tribunal directed the adjustment of interest from the penalty deposit made by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 07:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1253 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties under Section 76 and 75A of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s proactive compliance by registering and paying taxes before the Show Cause Notice demonstrated good faith, leading to the decision that penalties were unwarranted. Only interest for delayed payment was upheld, and the Tribunal directed the adjustment of interest from the penalty deposit made by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>