https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343512 An order granting or refusing bail is interlocutory, so revision under section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is barred. Where cancellation of bail is sought, the proper remedy is section 439(2), and cancellation requires compelling supervening circumstances such as interference with justice, evasion of justice, abuse of liberty, or other material showing continued liberty is incompatible with a fair trial. On that basis, the revisional court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to the bail order, and the cancellation order was unsustainable; the original bail order was restored, subject to compliance with the Magistrate's conditions. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343512 An order granting or refusing bail is interlocutory, so revision under section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is barred. Where cancellation of bail is sought, the proper remedy is section 439(2), and cancellation requires compelling supervening circumstances such as interference with justice, evasion of justice, abuse of liberty, or other material showing continued liberty is incompatible with a fair trial. On that basis, the revisional court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to the bail order, and the cancellation order was unsustainable; the original bail order was restored, subject to compliance with the Magistrate's conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343512