<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding recovery of rectified excess credit and imposing penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant rectified the error voluntarily, reversed the excess credit, paid interest, and reported it in their return, leading the Tribunal to find no grounds for penal proceedings. Interest liability was determined to apply only to the utilised credit for duty on final products, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for verification by authorities. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the importance of rectification and compliance with statutory obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding recovery of rectified excess credit and imposing penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant rectified the error voluntarily, reversed the excess credit, paid interest, and reported it in their return, leading the Tribunal to find no grounds for penal proceedings. Interest liability was determined to apply only to the utilised credit for duty on final products, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for verification by authorities. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the importance of rectification and compliance with statutory obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>