<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1243 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343505</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents supporting the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on inputs used for fabricating storage tanks classified as capital goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2017 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1243 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343505</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents supporting the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on inputs used for fabricating storage tanks classified as capital goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>