https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343494 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to determine the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue show-cause notices under the Customs Act. The Tribunal referenced a Supreme Court decision and subsequent amendments to Section 28 of the Customs Act designating DRI officers as proper officers. Due to conflicting views from different High Courts and a pending matter before the Supreme Court, the Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case for further consideration. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343494 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to determine the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue show-cause notices under the Customs Act. The Tribunal referenced a Supreme Court decision and subsequent amendments to Section 28 of the Customs Act designating DRI officers as proper officers. Due to conflicting views from different High Courts and a pending matter before the Supreme Court, the Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case for further consideration. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343494