<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1228 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343490</link>
    <description>A mandatory penalty under section 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act may be imposed for the first time by the revisional authority in suo motu revision proceedings, and the prior deletion of penalty was therefore unsustainable. The article also notes that the Tribunal&#039;s restriction of interest under section 47(4A) to 36 months was upheld, as the statutory framework in sub-clause (vi) supported that limitation. The overall effect was restoration of the penalty while leaving the interest ruling undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1228 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343490</link>
      <description>A mandatory penalty under section 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act may be imposed for the first time by the revisional authority in suo motu revision proceedings, and the prior deletion of penalty was therefore unsustainable. The article also notes that the Tribunal&#039;s restriction of interest under section 47(4A) to 36 months was upheld, as the statutory framework in sub-clause (vi) supported that limitation. The overall effect was restoration of the penalty while leaving the interest ruling undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>