<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1224 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192348</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for verification of the amount to be reversed with interest. The adjudicating authority was directed to allow the appellant to rectify any discrepancies. Penalties were deleted as the issue was interpretational without suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 07:09:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1224 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192348</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for verification of the amount to be reversed with interest. The adjudicating authority was directed to allow the appellant to rectify any discrepancies. Penalties were deleted as the issue was interpretational without suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>