<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 920 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192345</link>
    <description>Objections raised by a judgment-debtor after the executing court had crossed the Order XXI Rule 22 stage and moved towards attachment were held barred by constructive res judicata. Once the preliminary stage in execution is completed without challenge, the court may proceed under Order XXI Rules 23 and 24, and orders made at that stage attain finality unless set aside in appeal. The principle of res judicata applies to successive stages of the same proceeding as well as separate proceedings, preventing re-agitation of matters that were, or ought to have been, decided earlier. The subsequent objections were therefore not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 17:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 920 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192345</link>
      <description>Objections raised by a judgment-debtor after the executing court had crossed the Order XXI Rule 22 stage and moved towards attachment were held barred by constructive res judicata. Once the preliminary stage in execution is completed without challenge, the court may proceed under Order XXI Rules 23 and 24, and orders made at that stage attain finality unless set aside in appeal. The principle of res judicata applies to successive stages of the same proceeding as well as separate proceedings, preventing re-agitation of matters that were, or ought to have been, decided earlier. The subsequent objections were therefore not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>