<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192342</link>
    <description>The appeal was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further review without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of factual verification and adherence to principles of natural justice, directing the appellant to cooperate and provide relevant documents. The adjudicating authority was instructed to resolve the issue within three months from the date of the order&#039;s certified copy production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 17:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192342</link>
      <description>The appeal was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further review without expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of factual verification and adherence to principles of natural justice, directing the appellant to cooperate and provide relevant documents. The adjudicating authority was instructed to resolve the issue within three months from the date of the order&#039;s certified copy production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>