<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 786 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192333</link>
    <description>An administrative exemption order remains valid if the authority in fact possessed the underlying statutory power and the action is referable to a lawful source, even where the order does not expressly cite the correct provision. The SC held that the touring cinema exemption under Rule 14 was not liable to be set aside merely because Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act was not mentioned, since the exemption power was traceable to the amended proviso in Rule 14 and that amendment had already been upheld. The appellate court&#039;s interference was therefore unwarranted and the exemption stood restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 786 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192333</link>
      <description>An administrative exemption order remains valid if the authority in fact possessed the underlying statutory power and the action is referable to a lawful source, even where the order does not expressly cite the correct provision. The SC held that the touring cinema exemption under Rule 14 was not liable to be set aside merely because Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act was not mentioned, since the exemption power was traceable to the amended proviso in Rule 14 and that amendment had already been upheld. The appellate court&#039;s interference was therefore unwarranted and the exemption stood restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>