<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (10) TMI 1 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7934</link>
    <description>Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act permits reassessment where wealth has escaped assessment because no return was made, and a claim of disruption under Hindu law does not by itself defeat jurisdiction if the tax authority must still determine whether the Hindu undivided family remains assessable. Section 20 requires enquiry into whether the joint family property has been partitioned as a whole in definite portions by physical division by metes and bounds; mere severance of status is insufficient. If such physical partition is not proved, the family continues to be treated as a Hindu undivided family for wealth-tax purposes, and reassessment may proceed under section 20(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (10) TMI 1 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7934</link>
      <description>Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act permits reassessment where wealth has escaped assessment because no return was made, and a claim of disruption under Hindu law does not by itself defeat jurisdiction if the tax authority must still determine whether the Hindu undivided family remains assessable. Section 20 requires enquiry into whether the joint family property has been partitioned as a whole in definite portions by physical division by metes and bounds; mere severance of status is insufficient. If such physical partition is not proved, the family continues to be treated as a Hindu undivided family for wealth-tax purposes, and reassessment may proceed under section 20(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>