<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that M/s Sanghi Industries Ltd was eligible for a concessional rate of excise duty for cement sold in 50 kg bags to industrial and institutional consumers without declaring the MRP. Buyers were properly classified, with social, educational, and governmental entities considered institutional consumers. The Tribunal upheld that goods sold to such consumers did not require MRP declaration, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s demands for differential duty. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed M/s Sanghi Industries Ltd&#039;s appeals and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the eligibility for concessional duty rates under Notification No. 4/2006-CE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that M/s Sanghi Industries Ltd was eligible for a concessional rate of excise duty for cement sold in 50 kg bags to industrial and institutional consumers without declaring the MRP. Buyers were properly classified, with social, educational, and governmental entities considered institutional consumers. The Tribunal upheld that goods sold to such consumers did not require MRP declaration, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s demands for differential duty. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed M/s Sanghi Industries Ltd&#039;s appeals and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the eligibility for concessional duty rates under Notification No. 4/2006-CE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>