<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7931</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner-company&#039;s liaison expenditure was deductible, and the technical fees received were not taxable income. It found that there was no failure to disclose material facts, rendering the reassessment notices invalid under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court issued a writ of mandamus to recall the notices and a writ of prohibition against further action. The application was successful, with costs not awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7931</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner-company&#039;s liaison expenditure was deductible, and the technical fees received were not taxable income. It found that there was no failure to disclose material facts, rendering the reassessment notices invalid under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court issued a writ of mandamus to recall the notices and a writ of prohibition against further action. The application was successful, with costs not awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>