<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1175 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343437</link>
    <description>Imported hard disc drives were treated as eligible for the benefit of the exemption notification and the corresponding concessional customs duty rate. The issue was governed by an earlier coordinate-Bench decision on identical facts, which had already accepted such eligibility under the relevant exemption notification as amended from time to time. Applying that binding view, the impugned order was found unsustainable and the exemption benefit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 10:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1175 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343437</link>
      <description>Imported hard disc drives were treated as eligible for the benefit of the exemption notification and the corresponding concessional customs duty rate. The issue was governed by an earlier coordinate-Bench decision on identical facts, which had already accepted such eligibility under the relevant exemption notification as amended from time to time. Applying that binding view, the impugned order was found unsustainable and the exemption benefit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>