<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1174 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343436</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the matter in light of Rule-9 regarding the deduction of labour charges in a works contract. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the segregation of labour charges in a composite contract for Dam construction, ruling that 30% should be appropriated towards labour charges after excluding earthwork. Additionally, the Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order on the inclusion of purchase amounts in turnover, emphasizing that increases without basis could not be sustained. The revision was disposed of with detailed analysis and clarification on Rule-9 interpretation and labour charge segregation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 10:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1174 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343436</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the matter in light of Rule-9 regarding the deduction of labour charges in a works contract. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the segregation of labour charges in a composite contract for Dam construction, ruling that 30% should be appropriated towards labour charges after excluding earthwork. Additionally, the Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order on the inclusion of purchase amounts in turnover, emphasizing that increases without basis could not be sustained. The revision was disposed of with detailed analysis and clarification on Rule-9 interpretation and labour charge segregation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>