<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1164 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343426</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both tax appeals, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and the ITAT. It concluded that the respondent-assessee substantiated the commission payments to foreign agents as genuine business expenditures, rendering Section 40(a)(ia) inapplicable. The court found no substantial legal issues, supporting the deletion of the disallowance by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 10:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1164 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343426</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both tax appeals, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) and the ITAT. It concluded that the respondent-assessee substantiated the commission payments to foreign agents as genuine business expenditures, rendering Section 40(a)(ia) inapplicable. The court found no substantial legal issues, supporting the deletion of the disallowance by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>