<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1153 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under Section 147, the addition of Rs. 13,40,369 as unexplained investment under Section 69, and the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 10(38). The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on these issues, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1153 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under Section 147, the addition of Rs. 13,40,369 as unexplained investment under Section 69, and the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under Section 10(38). The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on these issues, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>