https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343414 The Tribunal reviewed the appeal concerning income enhancement, denial of natural justice, addition under section 69C for alleged bogus purchases, and expense enhancement. The Tribunal found errors in the Commissioner's actions, noting non-compliance with mandatory provisions and lack of cross-examination opportunities. It ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of certain additions, rejecting the enhancement of expenses, and upholding interest levies under sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence appreciation and adherence to legal procedures in tax assessments. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 May 2017 10:24:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343414 The Tribunal reviewed the appeal concerning income enhancement, denial of natural justice, addition under section 69C for alleged bogus purchases, and expense enhancement. The Tribunal found errors in the Commissioner's actions, noting non-compliance with mandatory provisions and lack of cross-examination opportunities. It ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of certain additions, rejecting the enhancement of expenses, and upholding interest levies under sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence appreciation and adherence to legal procedures in tax assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343414