<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192314</link>
    <description>The SC held that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, insurers must initially satisfy decrees in accident claims but can recover amounts from the owner or driver if policy breaches are proven. Insurers can raise defenses regarding driving license validity, but they bear the burden of proving negligence by the insured. The Claims Tribunal can adjudicate disputes and enforce decisions as arrears of land revenue. The petitions were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192314</link>
      <description>The SC held that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, insurers must initially satisfy decrees in accident claims but can recover amounts from the owner or driver if policy breaches are proven. Insurers can raise defenses regarding driving license validity, but they bear the burden of proving negligence by the insured. The Claims Tribunal can adjudicate disputes and enforce decisions as arrears of land revenue. The petitions were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>