https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192304 In Santhal Parganas, raiyati interest does not automatically merge into the superior proprietary interest merely because both interests come to one person; clear intention is required, and a later Bakasht Malik entry did not negate the earlier raiyati character. That later record was treated as a neutral description of cultivation and did not create res judicata on the existence of raiyati rights. A civil court may disregard a transfer made contrary to the statutory prohibition on alienation, and the special administrative remedy was not exhaustive. The sale of 15 May 1935 therefore passed only the rent-receiving right, not the raiyati interest. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 11:52:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192304 In Santhal Parganas, raiyati interest does not automatically merge into the superior proprietary interest merely because both interests come to one person; clear intention is required, and a later Bakasht Malik entry did not negate the earlier raiyati character. That later record was treated as a neutral description of cultivation and did not create res judicata on the existence of raiyati rights. A civil court may disregard a transfer made contrary to the statutory prohibition on alienation, and the special administrative remedy was not exhaustive. The sale of 15 May 1935 therefore passed only the rent-receiving right, not the raiyati interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192304