<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Additions u/s 68: Unexplained Sums Credited in Accounts Must Be Properly Explained, Cash or Cheque.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34958</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - Section 68 is clear enough as it uses the term &quot;sum is found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee&quot;. It does not make any distinction between any cash or cheque transaction. - Despite non-encashment of the cheques by the assessee, additions confirmed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Additions u/s 68: Unexplained Sums Credited in Accounts Must Be Properly Explained, Cash or Cheque.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34958</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - Section 68 is clear enough as it uses the term &quot;sum is found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee&quot;. It does not make any distinction between any cash or cheque transaction. - Despite non-encashment of the cheques by the assessee, additions confirmed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>