<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7914</link>
    <description>Whether a receipt from transfer of machinery was taxable as profits from an adventure in the nature of trade depended on the totality of circumstances, not on the assessee&#039;s original intention when the machinery was ordered. The facts showed that the original order for the Dandot plant was later diverted, the machinery was ultimately earmarked for Orissa Cement Ltd. after partition, an import licence was obtained in the meantime, and the plant was transferred to secure a higher price. On that sequence, the purchase and resale were interconnected, and the machinery was not treated as an indefinitely held capital investment. The receipt of Rs. 7 lakhs was therefore treated as trading profit and taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7914</link>
      <description>Whether a receipt from transfer of machinery was taxable as profits from an adventure in the nature of trade depended on the totality of circumstances, not on the assessee&#039;s original intention when the machinery was ordered. The facts showed that the original order for the Dandot plant was later diverted, the machinery was ultimately earmarked for Orissa Cement Ltd. after partition, an import licence was obtained in the meantime, and the plant was transferred to secure a higher price. On that sequence, the purchase and resale were interconnected, and the machinery was not treated as an indefinitely held capital investment. The receipt of Rs. 7 lakhs was therefore treated as trading profit and taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>