https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343408 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Order-in-Original confirming service tax demands and penalties. The appellant's challenges regarding short payment of service tax, wrongful availment of Cenvat Credit, and inadmissible benefits under a notification were rejected. Penalties under the Finance Act and Cenvat Credit Rules were upheld due to insufficient evidence and lack of mitigating circumstances. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments, leading to the maintenance of the confirmed service tax demands, disallowed Cenvat Credit, and penalties. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343408 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Order-in-Original confirming service tax demands and penalties. The appellant's challenges regarding short payment of service tax, wrongful availment of Cenvat Credit, and inadmissible benefits under a notification were rejected. Penalties under the Finance Act and Cenvat Credit Rules were upheld due to insufficient evidence and lack of mitigating circumstances. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments, leading to the maintenance of the confirmed service tax demands, disallowed Cenvat Credit, and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343408