https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343397 The Tribunal sustained the duty demand in the impugned order but found non-compliance with the Development Commissioner's instructions for Net Foreign Exchange (NFE) calculation. The order was set aside for remand to ensure adherence to the second direction. The adjudicating authority was directed to comply with NFE calculation within three months, allowing for fresh evidence if needed. Both parties acknowledged the non-compliance, leading to modifications in the order to facilitate adherence to the specified directions and provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity for additional evidence. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 07:07:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343397 The Tribunal sustained the duty demand in the impugned order but found non-compliance with the Development Commissioner's instructions for Net Foreign Exchange (NFE) calculation. The order was set aside for remand to ensure adherence to the second direction. The adjudicating authority was directed to comply with NFE calculation within three months, allowing for fresh evidence if needed. Both parties acknowledged the non-compliance, leading to modifications in the order to facilitate adherence to the specified directions and provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity for additional evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343397