<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343396</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the appellant, M/s Steel Authority of India (SAIL), was found entitled to Cenvat credit for input goods like adhesive tape, welding electrodes, gum boots, and concrete sleepers. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant based on the eligibility of welding electrodes for credit under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision highlighted previous cases supporting the appellant&#039;s claim and concluded that the appellant should receive Cenvat credit for the disputed items. As a result, the penalty imposed was dropped, and the appeal was allowed, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 07:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343396</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the appellant, M/s Steel Authority of India (SAIL), was found entitled to Cenvat credit for input goods like adhesive tape, welding electrodes, gum boots, and concrete sleepers. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant based on the eligibility of welding electrodes for credit under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision highlighted previous cases supporting the appellant&#039;s claim and concluded that the appellant should receive Cenvat credit for the disputed items. As a result, the penalty imposed was dropped, and the appeal was allowed, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>