<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1131 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343393</link>
    <description>An ex parte stay order may be recalled where the party shows sufficient cause for non-appearance and the recall is needed to secure the ends of justice. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; explanation that fog delayed arrival and that counsel could not attend because of a serious family illness. It also noted the matter had earlier been remanded after dispensing with pre-deposit. On that basis, the ex parte stay order was recalled and the stay applications were restored to their original numbers for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1131 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343393</link>
      <description>An ex parte stay order may be recalled where the party shows sufficient cause for non-appearance and the recall is needed to secure the ends of justice. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; explanation that fog delayed arrival and that counsel could not attend because of a serious family illness. It also noted the matter had earlier been remanded after dispensing with pre-deposit. On that basis, the ex parte stay order was recalled and the stay applications were restored to their original numbers for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>