https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343391 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding that the respondents' products were exempted goods under the Notification, rendering them ineligible for Cenvat Credit under Rule 6(1) of CCR, 2004. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was set aside, allowing the Revenue's appeals and clarifying that the respondents could not avail credit for manufacturing exempted goods. The Tribunal also determined that the credit taken on inputs before opting for the exemption did not require reversal, permitting the respondents to retain the credit for future duty payments. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343391 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding that the respondents' products were exempted goods under the Notification, rendering them ineligible for Cenvat Credit under Rule 6(1) of CCR, 2004. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was set aside, allowing the Revenue's appeals and clarifying that the respondents could not avail credit for manufacturing exempted goods. The Tribunal also determined that the credit taken on inputs before opting for the exemption did not require reversal, permitting the respondents to retain the credit for future duty payments. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343391