<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343374</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s penalty appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT had ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that certain disallowed claims did not constitute income concealment. The HC found no significant legal question and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 07:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343374</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s penalty appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT had ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that certain disallowed claims did not constitute income concealment. The HC found no significant legal question and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>