<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (5) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7908</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, upholding the assessment of wealth-tax on the Administrator-General under section 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court determined that the beneficiaries&#039; shares were indeterminate or unknown as of the valuation date, making the Administrator-General liable for the wealth-tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment was overturned, and the court concluded that the Administrator-General must pay the assessed wealth-tax amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (5) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7908</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, upholding the assessment of wealth-tax on the Administrator-General under section 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court determined that the beneficiaries&#039; shares were indeterminate or unknown as of the valuation date, making the Administrator-General liable for the wealth-tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment was overturned, and the court concluded that the Administrator-General must pay the assessed wealth-tax amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>