https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192295 A conflict in Division Bench authority concerned whether a Letters Patent Appeal lies from a Single Judge's order in a writ petition under Article 226, read with Section 482 CrPC, seeking quashing of an FIR. One line of authority treated such proceedings as falling within criminal jurisdiction and therefore barred intra-court appeal, while another treated the petition as an exercise of the High Court's original jurisdiction despite its criminal-law context. Because the issue affected the Delhi High Court's appellate jurisdiction and required authoritative resolution, the question was referred to a Full Bench. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2017 07:02:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192295 A conflict in Division Bench authority concerned whether a Letters Patent Appeal lies from a Single Judge's order in a writ petition under Article 226, read with Section 482 CrPC, seeking quashing of an FIR. One line of authority treated such proceedings as falling within criminal jurisdiction and therefore barred intra-court appeal, while another treated the petition as an exercise of the High Court's original jurisdiction despite its criminal-law context. Because the issue affected the Delhi High Court's appellate jurisdiction and required authoritative resolution, the question was referred to a Full Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192295