<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1174 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192294</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, ruling in favor of the cooperative bank regarding the disallowance of provisions for salary settlement. For A.Y. 2009-10, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, specifically in relation to the disallowance of provision for gratuity. However, the grounds concerning the levy of surcharge and interest u/s 234C were upheld as mandatory. The decision was pronounced on 20th September 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 18:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1174 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192294</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, ruling in favor of the cooperative bank regarding the disallowance of provisions for salary settlement. For A.Y. 2009-10, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, specifically in relation to the disallowance of provision for gratuity. However, the grounds concerning the levy of surcharge and interest u/s 234C were upheld as mandatory. The decision was pronounced on 20th September 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>