https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192292 In a partnership dispute, criminal prosecution was found unwarranted where the FIR did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, or conspiracy. Dishonest intention at the inception of inducement was absent, and the partnership deed and surrounding facts did not show the required entrustment of property; the FIR was therefore properly quashed. The court also held that a Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable against an order passed in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, since the matter was in substance a criminal remedy and intra-court appeal was excluded. The quashing order was upheld and the appeal declined. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 18:14:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192292 In a partnership dispute, criminal prosecution was found unwarranted where the FIR did not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, or conspiracy. Dishonest intention at the inception of inducement was absent, and the partnership deed and surrounding facts did not show the required entrustment of property; the FIR was therefore properly quashed. The court also held that a Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable against an order passed in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, since the matter was in substance a criminal remedy and intra-court appeal was excluded. The quashing order was upheld and the appeal declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192292